Skip to main content
Open Access Research Article

Investigating the influence of polyacrylonitrile nanofiber thickness on particulate matter filtration performance from cigarette smoke

1 , 1 ORCID , 2 , 1 ORCID , 1 * ORCID

Vol. 1 No. 1 |pp. 32–38 |Received Mar 9, 2024 |Revised Mar 11, 2024 |Accepted Mar 13, 2024

Copyright © 2026 The Authors. This publication is licensed under CC BY 4.0 .

Abstract

This study successfully fabricated polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber in various thicknesses as particulate matter (PM) filtration membranes using the electrospinning method. The PM source used was derived from cigarette smoke. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra are provided in the manuscript to observe the morphology and chemical composition of the fabricated nanofiber membrane. The thickness of the nanofiber was controlled based on the volume of the polymer solution, which was 4 mL, 6 mL, and 8 mL, and had a thickness of (52 ± 2) $\mu$m, (176 ± 27) $\mu$m, and (479 ± 38) $\mu$m, respectively (denoted as NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8 membranes). The results showed that the nanofiber membrane performed well against PM0.3, PM1, and PM2.5, with efficiency above 95.7\%. Furthermore, it was observed that increasing the thickness of the nanofiber resulted in higher filtration efficiency. This trend is evident in the NF-8 membrane, which exhibited an efficiency of (97.9 ± 0.3)\%, compared to only (95.7 ± 0.2)\% for the NF-4 membrane against PM0.3. However, the pressure drop is also higher ((0.03 ± 0.005) kPa), which causes a trade-off in the quality factor (QF) of fabricated nanofiber performance as a PM filtration membrane.

Keywords:
Nanofiber Polyacrylonitrile Particulate Matter Filtration Efficiency Pressure Drop Quality Factor

INTRODUCTION

Air pollution is an environmental problem that poses a significant threat to human health worldwide, ranging from minor upper irritation to chronic respiratory and heart disease, premature mortality, and lung cancer 1,2. The World Health Organization (WHO) data reveals that 99% of the world’s population is exposed to air containing elevated levels of pollutants 64. One of the primary components of the most harmful air pollution, impacting air quality, human health, and ecosystems, is particulate matter (PM) 3,4. PM is a general term for solid and liquid particles of small size suspended in air 5,6. Most of the PM comes from motor vehicle emissions 7, coal combustion 8, industrial emissions 9, and the burning process 10.

Many epidemiological data and clinical studies prove that PM exposure harms human health. Among the various impacts, one of the notable consequences is the onset of cardiovascular dysfunction 11. The long-term inhalation of PM, especially PM2.5 (diameter size < 2.5 \muμm), has been identified as a significant risk factor, contributing to an increased likelihood of death and heightened cardiovascular morbidity 12. This phenomenon happens as fine particles possess a large surface area, enabling them to transport various pollutants 13. In addition, fine particles also have a longer residence time in the air, so they can quickly and easily enter the respiratory system and cause cardiovascular and respiratory diseases by dissolving in the blood 14. Moreover, PM can also carry microorganisms, such as bacteria and viruses, that can harm human health 15.

Nanofiber-based filtration membranes, known for their high PM removal efficiency, offer a promising solution for some applications, such as enhancing face masks and respirators for effective virus protection and reducing air pollution from PM 16. Nanofiber, with an average diameter below 1 \muμm, exhibits superior removal efficiency against ultrafine PM compared to microfiber with an average diameter of up to 10 \muμm, especially for particles below 1.0 \muμm in diameter 17. In addition, nanofiber filters have higher porosity 18, lower pressure drop 19, and a large surface area, making them suitable for filtration membrane applications 20,21.

Figure 1. Nanofiber fabrication process using electrospinning method and PM filtration testing setup

Nanofiber membranes can be fabricated through several methods, including electrospinning. Electrospinning is a method capable of producing selective, cost-effective, and flexible membranes for various polymers 22,23,24,25,26. Electrospinning can fabricate fibers continuously with diameters ranging from micro to nanometers 19,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. Many polymers can be used for nanofiber membrane fabrication, including polyacrylonitrile (PAN) 35,36, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) 37,38, polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) 39,40,41, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) 42, polystyrene (PS) 43,44, polypropylene (PP) 45,46, and others. Among these polymers, nanofiber membranes made from PAN polymers are often applied as filtration media because they have good chemical, mechanical strength, and thermal stability 47. In addition, it also has an average diameter of about 141 nm48. Considering the average fiber diameter achieved by previous researchers, the PAN membrane is predicted to filter PM that might pass through the membrane. However, research has been widely reported on fabricating nanofiber membranes using PAN polymer material by electrospinning as an air filtration membrane 49,50. In this study, we focus on the effect of PAN nanofiber thickness on its performance as a PM filtration membrane. Cigarette smoke, which is widely dispersed in the air, was used as a PM source to mimic the ability of the fabricated membrane to the real sample. The morphology and functional groups of the PAN nanofiber membrane were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR). The fabricated PAN nanofiber-based PM filtration membrane from this research is expected to be utilized as an air filter in indoor devices and respiratory protective equipment, such as masks and respirators.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Reagents And Instruments

Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) powder (Mw 150,000 g.mol-1) dan N, N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) (Mw 73.09 g.mol-1) were all produced by Sigma Aldrich, Singapore. A commercial cigarette was used as a PM source (PT. Gudang Garam Tbk.). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6510) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Thermo Nicolet iS10) were employed to investigate the morphologies and chemical compositions of the fabricated PAN nanofiber-based PM filtration membrane. The particle counter (CEM DT-9881) and digital manometer (HT 1890) were utilized to measure the PM concentrations and pressure drop of the membrane before and after passing the membrane. ImageJ and OriginLab software were used to measure the diameter of the nanofiber and visualize the data in the graph, respectively.

Nanofiber Fabrication Process

PAN solution, with a concentration of 6 wt%, was achieved by dissolving the PAN polymer in DMF. The solution was stirred for 2 hours at 40 ^\circC with a rotating speed of 600 rpm until a homogeneous solution was obtained. The solution was put into a 10 cc syringe with a 0.50 × 25 mm needle. The syringe was put into the electrospinning machine during the nanofiber fabrication process. The needle was the positive pole, while the ground was connected to the plate collector. The electrospinning process was conducted with a voltage of 7 kV and a tip-to-collector distance of 14 cm. PAN nanofiber-based membranes were made in several thicknesses controlled by the total volume of solution used during the electrospinning process of 4 mL, 6 mL, and 8 mL, denoted as NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8 membranes, respectively. The illustration of the nanofiber fabrication process can be seen in figure 1

Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of fabricated PAN nanofiber with different magnification of 5,000× and 3,000×
Figure 3. (a) Diameter distribution of fabricated PAN nanofiber. (b) The thickness of nanofiber-based PM filtration membrane with various solution volumes of 4 mL, 6 mL, and 8 mL (denoted as NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8, respectively). (c) Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of fabricated PAN nanofiber.

Filtrations Test Process

In this research, cigarette smoke was used as the PM source, and the PM filtration setup is shown in figure 1. The test was carried out by placing the PAN nanofiber-based membrane in the membrane holder. PM concentration was measured using a particle counter in each tank (before and after passing the membrane, recorded as \mathrm{C_0}C0 and \mathrm{C_1}C1, respectively). Data collection was collected five times for each membrane. Then, a digital manometer was installed in each tank to read the pressure difference (a.k.a. pressure drop). The data on particle concentration and pressure drop obtained from the test was subsequently analyzed using the following equation to determine the filtration efficiency (Equation 1) and quality factor (QF) (Equation 2) of the PAN nanofiber-based membrane.

where \etaη is PM filtration efficiency (%), and \mathrm{C_0}C0 and \mathrm{C-1}C1 were PM concentrations before and after filtration, respectively 49,51,52.

where \DeltaΔ P is the pressure drop (Pa) of the air filtration membrane 53,54,55,56,57.

Figure 4. The filtration efficiency of PM0.3, PM1.0, and PM2.5 of (a) NF-4, (b) NF-6, and (c) NF-8 membranes

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Morphology, Size Analysis, And Chemical Composition of PAN Nanofiber-Based Membranes

Figure 5. The quality factor of fabricated nanofiber as PM filtration membrane

Figure 2 shows the SEM images of PAN nanofiber with two different magnifications of 5,000× and 3,000×. PAN nanofiber is seen to have a smooth and continuous morphology; these results are in accordance with previous studies 58,59. Based on the SEM image, nanofiber diameters were measured using ImageJ software (see figure 3a). The measurement results show that the nanofibers have a diameter of 224 nm to 738 nm, with an average diameter of (410 ± 78) nm, tending to have a small diameter. The small diameter is very beneficial in increasing the efficiency of the nanofiber-based PM membrane on the Kuwabara model, which shows that the filtration efficiency is inversely proportional to the diameter of the nanofiber 47,60,61,62. In this study, the thickness of the nanofiber membrane was varied using the volume of solution, namely 4 mL, 6 mL, and 8 mL (denoted as NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8 membranes, respectively). Figure 3b shows the measurement of nanofiber membrane thickness. The thickness of the membrane is measured by measuring the results of the SEM cross-sectional image of the membrane using ImageJ software. Measurements were made three times (n = 3) at different locations. The result shows that nanofiber membranes have a thickness of (52 ± 2) 63. In this study, the thickness of the nanofiber membrane was varied using the volume of solution, namely 4 mL, 6 mL, and 8 mL (denoted as NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8 membranes, respectively). Figure [FIGREF:3]b shows the measurement of nanofiber membrane thickness. The thickness of the membrane is measured by measuring the results of the SEM cross-sectional image of the membrane using ImageJ software. Measurements were made three times (n = 3) at different locations. The result shows that nanofiber membranes have a thickness of (52 ± 2) \muμm, (176 ± 27) \muμm, and (479 ± 38) \muμm for NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8. The result indicates that a more polymer solution volume is used in electrospinning, making the resulting membrane thicker.

Figure 6. The recap of fabricated PM filtration membrane efficiency towards PM0.3, PM1.0, and PM2.5.

In addition to confirming the morphology and thickness of the PAN nanofibers by SEM images, we also provided FTIR spectra of fabricated nanofibers (see figure 3c). An FTIR spectra was conducted to identify functional groups and chemical composition of the fabricated nanofiber. The PAN nanofiber has a peak at a wavenumber of 2923.84 cm-1 and 2243.07 cm-1, indicating the presence of C-H and C\equivN stretching. There is also a peak at 1452.78 cm-1 and 1070.06 cm-1, indicating the \mathrm{CH_{2}}CH2 bending and C-C stretching. The peaks of the PAN nanofiber obtained show the same results as the previous study 63; this shows that the electrospun PAN nanofiber was successfully made.

PM Filtration Performance

PM filtration performance tests were carried out to determine the ability of fabricated PAN nanofiber to filter the PM with a size below 2.5 \muμm (i.e., PM0.3, PM1, and PM2.5). Hence, cigarette smoke was chosen as the PM source due to its presence as a common pollutant in the air. Moreover, its accessibility and ease of application make it suitable for testing in PM filtration equipment. Figure 4a shows the efficiency measurement results of the NF-4 membrane against PM0.3, PM1.0, and PM2.5. Efficiency measurements were made three times (n = 3), where the standard deviation of the repeated measurements was used as the error bar on the graph. The efficiencies obtained are (95.7 ± 0.2)%, (97.5 ± 0.3), and (98.1 ± 0.2)%, respectively. It can be observed that the higher the particle size, the higher the efficiency. This phenomenon is because particles with larger sizes tend to stick more easily and get trapped in the nanofiber membrane, causing greater efficiency. In addition to NF-4, the efficiency of NF-6 and NF-8 membranes were also measured and found to be (97.6 ± 0.1)%, (99.3 ± 0.1)%, and (99.6 ± 0.1)% for NF-6 and (97.9 ± 0.3)%, (99.4 ± 0.1)%, and (99.8 ± 0.1)% for NF-8 against PM0.3, PM1.0, and PM2.5, respectively (see Figure 4b and 4c). Furthermore, the recapitulation efficiency of fabricated membranes shows that thicker membranes give higher efficiency towards all the PM sizes (i.e., PM0.3, PM1.0, and PM2.5) (see Figure 6). This result indicates that the thickness of the PM filtration membrane can influence its efficiency. However, the performance of the PM filtration membrane is not only about efficiency. The pressure drop is also an important aspect. A good PM membrane usually has a low-pressure drop, indicating high breathability, allowing air to pass easily. According to this issue, the digital manometer recorded a pressure drop of (0.01 ± 0.005) kPa, (0.02 ± 0.005) kPa, and (0.03 ± 0.005) kPa for NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8 membranes, respectively. To assess the nanofiber performance as a PM filtration membrane, considering both efficiency and pressure drop, the quality factor (QF) of the PM filtration membrane is calculated using the equation provided in Equation 2. The calculation results show that the QF amounted to 0.31 Pa -1 Pa-1, 0.19 Pa-1, and 0.12 Pa-1, for PM0.3, amounted to 0.37 Pa-1, 0.25 Pa-1 for PM 2.5, respectively (see figure 5). Based on these values, it can be seen that for each PM, the QF value of the membrane is getting. Although NF-8 has the highest efficiency value, it tends to have a high-pressure drop, causing a low-quality factor. Evaluation of the quality factor of the membrane is very important in getting a membrane that has good efficiency and low-pressure drop.-1 for PM1.0, and amounted to 0.40 -1, 0.28 Pa-1, and 0.20 Pa-1 for PM 2.5, respectively (see figure [FIGREF:5]). Based on these values, it can be seen that for each PM, the QF value of the membrane is getting. Although NF-8 has the highest efficiency value, it tends to have a high-pressure drop, causing a low-quality factor. Evaluation of the quality factor of the membrane is very important in getting a membrane that has good efficiency and low-pressure drop.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully produced polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber membranes of various thicknesses for particulate matter (PM) filtration from cigarette smoke, employing the electrospinning technique. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were provided to examine the nanofiber membrane’s morphology and chemical composition. Nanofiber thickness was achieved of (52 ± 2) \muμm, (176 ± 27) \muμm, and (479 ± 38) \muμm for NF-4, NF-6, and NF-8, respectively. The result revealed excellent PM0.3, PM1, and PM2.5 filtration efficiencies, exceeding 95.7%. Moreover, a clear trend showed that increased nanofiber thickness correlated with higher filtration efficiency. However, this also led to a higher pressure drop ((0.03 ± 0.005) kPa) and a decrease in quality factor (QF).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all PT Nanosense Instrument Indonesia and PT Fumalife Sinergi Inovasi employees who have provided technical support in this presented research work.

References

  1. 1.

    Kampa Marilena, Castanas Elias Human health effects of air pollution. Environmental Pollution 151 ( 2 ) 362 – 367 ( 2008 ).

  2. 2.

    Raaschou-Nielsen Ole, Andersen Zorana J, Beelen Rob, Samoli Evangelia, Stafoggia Massimo, Weinmayr Gudrun, Hoffmann Barbara, Fischer Paul, Nieuwenhuijsen Mark J, Brunekreef Bert, Xun Wei W, Katsouyanni Klea, Dimakopoulou Konstantina, Sommar Johan, Forsberg Bertil, Modig Lars, Oudin Anna, Oftedal Bente, Schwarze Per E, Nafstad Per, De Faire Ulf, Pedersen Nancy L, Östenson Claes-Göran, Fratiglioni Laura, Penell Johanna, Korek Michal, Pershagen Göran, Eriksen Kirsten T, Sørensen Mette, Tjønneland Anne, Ellermann Thomas, Eeftens Marloes, Peeters Petra H, Meliefste Kees, Wang Meng, Bueno-de-Mesquita Bas, Key Timothy J, De Hoogh Kees, Concin Hans, Nagel Gabriele, Vilier Alice, Grioni Sara, Krogh Vittorio, Tsai Ming-Yi, Ricceri Fulvio, Sacerdote Carlotta, Galassi Claudia, Migliore Enrica, Ranzi Andrea, Cesaroni Giulia, Badaloni Chiara, Forastiere Francesco, Tamayo Ibon, Amiano Pilar, Dorronsoro Miren, Trichopoulou Antonia, Bamia Christina, Vineis Paolo, Hoek Gerard Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). The Lancet Oncology 14 ( 9 ) 813 – 822 ( 2013 ).

  3. 3.

    Hamanaka Robert B., Mutlu Gökhan M. Particulate Matter Air Pollution: Effects on the Cardiovascular System. Frontiers in Endocrinology 9 680 ( 2018 ).

  4. 4.

    Kim Ki-Hyun, Kabir Ehsanul, Kabir Shamin A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environment International 74 136 – 143 ( 2015 ).

  5. 5.

    Naing Nyi Nyi, Lee Hian Kee Microextraction and analysis of contaminants adsorbed on atmospheric fine particulate matter: A review. Journal of Chromatography A 1627 461433 ( 2020 ).

  6. 6.

    Wenger Daniela, Gerecke Andreas C., Heeb Norbert V., Hueglin Christoph, Seiler Cornelia, Haag Regula, Naegeli Hanspeter, Zenobi Renato Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated activity of atmospheric particulate matter from an urban and a rural site in Switzerland. Atmospheric Environment 43 ( 22-23 ) 3556 – 3562 ( 2009 ).

  7. 7.

    Zong Zheng, Wang Xiaoping, Tian Chongguo, Chen Yingjun, Qu Lin, Ji Ling, Zhi Guorui, Li Jun, Zhang Gan Source apportionment of PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt; at a regional background site in NorthChina using PMF linked with radiocarbon analysis: insight into thecontribution of biomass burning. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16 ( 17 ) 11249 – 11265 ( 2016 ).

  8. 8.

    Tao J., Gao J., Zhang L., Zhang R., Che H., Zhang Z., Lin Z., Jing J., Cao J., Hsu S.-C. PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt; pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14 ( 16 ) 8679 – 8699 ( 2014 ).

  9. 9.

    Bai Yu, Han Chang Bao, He Chuan, Gu Guang Qin, Nie Jin Hui, Shao Jia Jia, Xiao Tian Xiao, Deng Chao Ran, Wang Zhong Lin Washable Multilayer Triboelectric Air Filter for Efficient Particulate Matter PM $_{\textrm2.5}$ Removal. Advanced Functional Materials 28 ( 15 ) 1706680 ( 2018 ).

  10. 10.

    Watson John G, Chow Judith C, Houck James E PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemosphere 43 ( 8 ) 1141 – 1151 ( 2001 ).

  11. 11.

    Nelin Timothy D., Joseph Allan M., Gorr Matthew W., Wold Loren E. Direct and indirect effects of particulate matter on the cardiovascular system. Toxicology Letters 208 ( 3 ) 293 – 299 ( 2012 ).

  12. 12.

    Brook Robert D., Rajagopalan Sanjay, Pope C. Arden, Brook Jeffrey R., Bhatnagar Aruni, Diez-Roux Ana V., Holguin Fernando, Hong Yuling, Luepker Russell V., Mittleman Murray A., Peters Annette, Siscovick David, Smith Sidney C., Whitsel Laurie, Kaufman Joel D. Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update to the Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 121 ( 21 ) 2331 – 2378 ( 2010 ).

  13. 13.

    Odabasi Mustafa, Cetin Banu, Bayram Abdurrahman Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) on Fine and Coarse Atmospheric Particles Measured at Two (Urban and Industrial) Sites. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 15 ( 5 ) 1894 – 1905 ( 2015 ).

  14. 14.

    Xue Tao, Zhu Tong, Zheng Yixuan, Zhang Qiang Declines in mental health associated with air pollution and temperature variability in China. Nature Communications 10 ( 1 ) 2165 ( 2019 ).

  15. 15.

    Bourdrel Thomas, Annesi-Maesano Isabella, Alahmad Barrak, Maesano Cara N., Bind Marie-Abèle The impact of outdoor air pollution on COVID-19: a review of evidence from in vitro, animal, and human studies. European Respiratory Review 30 ( 159 ) 200242 ( 2021 ).

  16. 16.

    Essa Wafa, Yasin Suhad, Saeed Ibtisam, Ali Gomaa Nanofiber-Based Face Masks and Respirators as COVID-19 Protection: A Review. Membranes 11 ( 4 ) 250 ( 2021 ).

  17. 17.

    Zhang Shichao, Tang Ning, Cao Leitao, Yin Xia, Yu Jianyong, Ding Bin Highly Integrated Polysulfone/Polyacrylonitrile/Polyamide-6 Air Filter for Multilevel Physical Sieving Airborne Particles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8 ( 42 ) 29062 – 29072 ( 2016 ).

  18. 18.

    Liao Yuan, Loh Chun-Heng, Tian Miao, Wang Rong, Fane Anthony G. Progress in electrospun polymeric nanofibrous membranes for water treatment: Fabrication, modification and applications. Progress in Polymer Science 77 69 – 94 ( 2018 ).

  19. 19.

    Lou Ching-Wen, Lin Meng-Chen, Huang Chen-Hung, Lai Mei-Feng, Shiu Bing-Chiuan, Lin Jia-Horng Preparation of Needleless Electrospinning Polyvinyl Alcohol/Water-Soluble Chitosan Nanofibrous Membranes: Antibacterial Property and Filter Efficiency. Polymers 14 ( 5 ) 1054 ( 2022 ).

  20. 20.

    Sun B., Long Y.Z., Zhang H.D., Li M.M., Duvail J.L., Jiang X.Y., Yin H.L. Advances in three-dimensional nanofibrous macrostructures via electrospinning. Progress in Polymer Science 39 ( 5 ) 862 – 890 ( 2014 ).

  21. 21.

    Leung Wallace Woon-Fong, Hung Chi-Ho, Yuen Ping-Tang Effect of face velocity, nanofiber packing density and thickness on filtration performance of filters with nanofibers coated on a substrate. Separation and Purification Technology 71 ( 1 ) 30 – 37 ( 2010 ).

  22. 22.

    Rianjanu Aditya, Marpaung Kurniawan Deny Pratama, Melati Elisabeth Kartini Arum, Aflaha Rizky, Wibowo Yudha Gusti, Mahendra I Putu, Yulianto Nursidik, Widakdo Januar, Triyana Kuwat, Wasisto Hutomo Suryo, Taher Tarmizi Integrated adsorption and photocatalytic removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solution by hierarchical Nb2O5@PAN/PVDF/ANO composite nanofibers. Nano Materials Science S2589965123000673 ( 2023 ).

  23. 23.

    Roche Remi, Yalcinkaya Fatma Incorporation of PVDF Nanofibre Multilayers into Functional Structure for Filtration Applications. Nanomaterials 8 ( 10 ) 771 ( 2018 ).

  24. 24.

    Deitzel J Controlled deposition of electrospun poly(ethylene oxide) fibers. Polymer 42 ( 19 ) 8163 – 8170 ( 2001 ).

  25. 25.

    Aflaha Rizky, Afiyanti Henny, Azizah Zhafirah Nur, Khoirudin Hanif, Rianjanu Aditya, Kusumaatmaja Ahmad, Roto Roto, Triyana Kuwat Improving ammonia sensing performance of quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) coated with nanofibers and polyaniline (PANi) overlay. Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X 13 100300 ( 2023 ).

  26. 26.

    Aflaha Rizky, Sari Nur Laili Indah, Katriani Laila, As'ari Ahmad Hasan, Kusumaatmaja Ahmad, Rianjanu Aditya, Roto Roto, Wasisto Hutomo Suryo, Triyana Kuwat Maltodextrin-overlaid polyvinyl acetate nanofibers for highly sensitive and selective room-temperature ammonia sensors. Microchemical Journal 193 109237 ( 2023 ).

  27. 27.

    Xue Jiajia, Wu Tong, Dai Yunqian, Xia Younan Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chemical Reviews 119 ( 8 ) 5298 – 5415 ( 2019 ).

  28. 28.

    Lyu Chenxin, Zhao Peng, Xie Jun, Dong Shuyuan, Liu Jiawei, Rao Chengchen, Fu Jianzhong Electrospinning of Nanofibrous Membrane and Its Applications in Air Filtration: A Review. Nanomaterials 11 ( 6 ) 1501 ( 2021 ).

  29. 29.

    Gopal Renuga, Kaur Satinderpal, Feng Chao Yang, Chan Casey, Ramakrishna Seeram, Tabe Shahram, Matsuura Takeshi Electrospun nanofibrous polysulfone membranes as pre-filters: Particulate removal. Journal of Membrane Science 289 ( 1-2 ) 210 – 219 ( 2007 ).

  30. 30.

    Thavasi V., Singh G., Ramakrishna S. Electrospun nanofibers in energy and environmental applications. Energy & Environmental Science 1 ( 2 ) 205 ( 2008 ).

  31. 31.

    Aflaha Rizky, Katriani Laila, As’ari Ahmad Hasan, Sari Nur Laili Indah, Kusumaatmaja Ahmad, Rianjanu Aditya, Roto Roto, Triyana Kuwat Enhanced trimethylamine gas sensor sensitivity based on quartz crystal microbalance using nanofibers overlaid with maltodextrin. MRS Communications 13 ( 4 ) 664 – 672 ( 2023 ).

  32. 32.

    Rianjanu Aditya, Aulya Mubarakatin, Rayhan Muhammad A. A. P., Aflaha Rizky, Maulana Sena, Taher Tarmizi, Sipahutar Wahyu S., Maulana Muhammad Iqbal, Yulianto Nursidik, Triyana Kuwat, Wasisto Hutomo Suryo Impact of hydrophilic bamboo cellulose functionalization on electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber-based humidity sensors. MRS Communications 13 ( 3 ) 514 – 519 ( 2023 ).

  33. 33.

    Rianjanu Aditya, Aflaha Rizky, Khamidy Nur Istiqomah, Djamal Mitra, Triyana Kuwat, Wasisto Hutomo Suryo Room-temperature ppb-level trimethylamine gas sensors functionalized with citric acid-doped polyvinyl acetate nanofibrous mats. Materials Advances 2 ( 11 ) 3705 – 3714 ( 2021 ).

  34. 34.

    Sofa Sintia Ainus, Roto Roto, Aflaha Rizky, Natsir Taufik Abdillah, Humairah Nur Aisyah, Kusumaatmaja Ahmad, Triyana Kuwat, Gupta Ruchi Formaldehyde gas sensors based on a quartz crystal microbalance modified with aniline-doped polyvinyl acetate nanofibers. The Analyst 149 ( 4 ) 1262 – 1270 ( 2024 ).

  35. 35.

    Zhang Haitao, Nie Huali, Yu Dengguang, Wu Chengyao, Zhang Yunlong, White Christopher J. Branford, Zhu Limin Surface modification of electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber towards developing an affinity membrane for bromelain adsorption. Desalination 256 ( 1-3 ) 141 – 147 ( 2010 ).

  36. 36.

    Chen Ming, Wang Chengjiao, Fang Wei, Wang Jing, Zhang Wang, Jin Gong, Diao Guowang Electrospinning of Calixarene-Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Membranes and Application as an Adsorbent and Catalyst Support. Langmuir 29 ( 38 ) 11858 – 11867 ( 2013 ).

  37. 37.

    Jiang Jinhong, Zhu Liping, Zhu Lijing, Zhang Hongtao, Zhu Baoku, Xu Youyi Antifouling and Antimicrobial Polymer Membranes Based on Bioinspired Polydopamine and Strong Hydrogen-Bonded Poly( \textit{N} -vinyl pyrrolidone). ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5 ( 24 ) 12895 – 12904 ( 2013 ).

  38. 38.

    Taha Ahmed A., Qiao Junlian, Li Fengting, Zhang Bingru Preparation and application of amino functionalized mesoporous nanofiber membrane via electrospinning for adsorption of Cr3+ from aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Sciences 24 ( 4 ) 610 – 616 ( 2012 ).

  39. 39.

    Khamidy Nur Istiqomah, Aflaha Rizky, Nurfani Eka, Djamal Mitra, Triyana Kuwat, Wasisto Hutomo Suryo, Rianjanu Aditya Influence of dopant concentration on the ammonia sensing performance of citric acid-doped polyvinyl acetate nanofibers. Analytical Methods 14 ( 47 ) 4956 – 4966 ( 2022 ).

  40. 40.

    I\csik Ceyhun, Arabac\i G\"okmen, I\cspirli Do{\ug}aç Yasemin, Deveci {.I}lyas, Teke Mustafa Synthesis and characterization of electrospun PVA/{Zn}2+ metal composite nanofibers for lipase immobilization with effective thermal, pH stabilities and reusability. Materials Science and Engineering: C 99 1226 – 1235 ( 2019 ).

  41. 41.

    Wang Wenwen, Lu Ying, Luo Mengying, Zhao Qinghua, Wang Yuedan, Liu Qiongzhen, Li Mufang, Wang Dong Zwitterionic‐polymer‐functionalized poly(vinyl alcohol‐ co ‐ethylene) nanofiber membrane for resistance to the adsorption of bacteria and protein. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 133 ( 44 ) app.44169 ( 2016 ).

  42. 42.

    Khoirudin Hanif, Aflaha Rizky, Arsetiyani Eldiana Rully, Nugraheni Ari Dwi, Nurputra Dian Kesumapramudya, Triyana Kuwat, Kusumaatmaja Ahmad Influence of the SMN antibody on quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) surface as an SMN protein biosensor. MRS Communications 14 ( 1 ) 34 – 40 ( 2023 ).

  43. 43.

    Li Xiong, Wang Ce, Yang Yin, Wang Xuefen, Zhu Meifang, Hsiao Benjamin S. Dual-Biomimetic Superhydrophobic Electrospun Polystyrene Nanofibrous Membranes for Membrane Distillation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6 ( 4 ) 2423 – 2430 ( 2014 ).

  44. 44.

    Lee Min Wook, An Seongpil, Latthe Sanjay S., Lee Changmin, Hong Seungkwan, Yoon Sam S. Electrospun Polystyrene Nanofiber Membrane with Superhydrophobicity and Superoleophilicity for Selective Separation of Water and Low Viscous Oil. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5 ( 21 ) 10597 – 10604 ( 2013 ).

  45. 45.

    Zhang Heng, Zhen Qi, Cui Jing-Qiang, Sun Huan-Wei, Liu Rang-Tong, Zhang Yi-Feng, Liu Yong Binary Structured Polypropylene/Polyethylene Glycol Micro-nanofibrous Membranes with Enhanced Water and Air Permeability. Fibers and Polymers 22 ( 1 ) 69 – 76 ( 2021 ).

  46. 46.

    Cho Sunghun, Kim Minkyu, Lee Jun Seop, Jang Jyongsik Polypropylene/Polyaniline Nanofiber/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite with Enhanced Electrical, Dielectric, and Ferroelectric Properties for a High Energy Density Capacitor. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7 ( 40 ) 22301 – 22314 ( 2015 ).

  47. 47.

    Huang Jinhui Jeanne, Tian Yuxiao, Wang Rong, Tian Miao, Liao Yuan Fabrication of bead-on-string polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous air filters with superior filtration efficiency and ultralow pressure drop. Separation and Purification Technology 237 116377 ( 2020 ).

  48. 48.

    Hashmi Motahira, Ullah Sana, Kim Ick Soo Copper oxide (CuO) loaded polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber membranes for antimicrobial breath mask applications. Current Research in Biotechnology 1 1 – 10 ( 2019 ).

  49. 49.

    Kang Yutang, Chen Jiahao, Feng Shasha, Zhou Huixian, Zhou Fangqi, Low Ze-Xian, Zhong Zhaoxiang, Xing Weihong Efficient removal of high-temperature particulate matters via a heat resistant and flame retardant thermally-oxidized PAN/PVP/SnO2 nanofiber membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 662 120985 ( 2022 ).

  50. 50.

    Cheng Xiao, Zhao Lei, Zhang Zhiwei, Deng Cheng, Li Chao, Du Yaohua, Shi Jianwei, Zhu Mengfu Highly efficient, low-resistant, well-ordered PAN nanofiber membranes for air filtration. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 655 130302 ( 2022 ).

  51. 51.

    Li Manqing, Feng Yingnan, Wang Kaiyu, Yong Wai Fen, Yu Liya, Chung Tai-Shung Novel Hollow Fiber Air Filters for the Removal of Ultrafine Particles in PM $_{\textrm2.5}$ with Repetitive Usage Capability. Environmental Science & Technology 51 ( 17 ) 10041 – 10049 ( 2017 ).

  52. 52.

    Souzandeh Hamid, Scudiero Louis, Wang Yu, Zhong Wei-Hong A Disposable Multi-Functional Air Filter: Paper Towel/Protein Nanofibers with Gradient Porous Structures for Capturing Pollutants of Broad Species and Sizes. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5 ( 7 ) 6209 – 6217 ( 2017 ).

  53. 53.

    Kim Byeunggon, Jang Yunseon, Kim Juhyeon, Kang Su Kyung, Song Jungeun, Kim Dong-Wook, Jang Seohyeon, Nam Inho, Lee Pyung Soo, Jeong Soo-Hwan High-performance electrospun particulate matter (PM) filters embedded with self-polarizable tetragonal BaTiO3 nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal 450 138340 ( 2022 ).

  54. 54.

    Li Yuyao, Yin Xia, Yu Jianyong, Ding Bin Electrospun nanofibers for high-performance air filtration. Composites Communications 15 6 – 19 ( 2019 ).

  55. 55.

    Givehchi Raheleh, Li Qinghai, Tan Zhongchao Quality factors of PVA nanofibrous filters for airborne particles in the size range of 10–125 nm. Fuel 181 1273 – 1280 ( 2016 ).

  56. 56.

    Liu Fan, Li Mengying, Shao Weili, Yue Wanli, Hu Baoji, Weng Kai, Chen Yuankun, Liao Xi, He Jianxin Preparation of a polyurethane electret nanofiber membrane and its air-filtration performance. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 557 318 – 327 ( 2019 ).

  57. 57.

    Huang Zhao-Xia, Liu Xiaoxiao, Zhang Xu, Wong Shing-Chung, Chase George G., Qu Jin-Ping, Baji Avinash Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride containing nanoscale graphite platelets as electret membrane and its application in air filtration under extreme environment. Polymer 131 143 – 150 ( 2017 ).

  58. 58.

    Hidayat Shidiq Nur, Julian Trisna, Rianjanu Aditya, Kusumaatmadja Ahmad, Triyana Kuwat, Roto Quartz crystal microbalance coated by PAN nanofibers and PEDOT:PSS for humidity sensor. 2017 International Seminar on Sensors, Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology (ISSIMM) 119 – 123 ( 2017 ).

  59. 59.

    Rianjanu Aditya, Roto Roto, Julian Trisna, Hidayat Shidiq, Kusumaatmaja Ahmad, Suyono Eko, Triyana Kuwat Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber-Based Quartz Crystal Microbalance for Sensitive Detection of Safrole. Sensors 18 ( 4 ) 1150 ( 2018 ).

  60. 60.

    Kuwabara Sinzi The Forces experienced by Randomly Distributed Parallel Circular Cylinders or Spheres in a Viscous Flow at Small Reynolds Numbers. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 14 ( 4 ) 527 – 532 ( 1959 ).

  61. 61.

    Russo Francesca, Castro-Muñoz Roberto, Santoro Sergio, Galiano Francesco, Figoli Alberto A review on electrospun membranes for potential air filtration application. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 ( 5 ) 108452 ( 2022 ).

  62. 62.

    Hosseini S.A., Tafreshi H. Vahedi 3-D simulation of particle filtration in electrospun nanofibrous filters. Powder Technology 201 ( 2 ) 153 – 160 ( 2010 ).

  63. 63.

    Cipriani E., Zanetti M., Bracco P., Brunella V., Luda M.P., Costa L. Crosslinking and carbonization processes in PAN films and nanofibers. Polymer Degradation and Stability 123 178 – 188 ( 2016 ).

  64. 64.

    WHO Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution.